About case laws on partial partition of joint properties
About case laws on partial partition of joint properties
Blog Article
refers into a landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Right here’s a brief overview:
Delay in recording confessional statement is probably not treated fatal into the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of sooner or later while in the registration of FIR which has not been explained through the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness of the alleged incidence as well as prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession from the petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened for being the real brothers with the deceased but they did not respond in any respect on the confessional statements with the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not search much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation regarding why her arrest wasn't effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on numerous situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is really a weak sort of evidence which could possibly be manoeuvred through the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is likewise counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners together on a motorcycle at four.
Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue advice with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
R.O, Office, Gujranwala and also the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade in the accused has not been conducted still. In the instant case, now the accused attempted to consider advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image on the petitioner was greatly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity on the accused through electronic media. The legislation lends assurance on the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for your witness to determine the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer put a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and generated pics. Apart from, the images shown over the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to cover his identity until he was place up for an identification parade. Making photos of your accused publically, both by showing the same to the witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or application, would create doubt within the proceedings with the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be certain that there is no probability for your witness to begin to see the accused before going into the identification parade. The accused should not be shown on the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or even the press or electronic media. Presented the reasons elaborated over, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.
Power to levy tax also to legislate on immovable property such as tax on yearly rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 on the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is because service with the grievance notice is often a mandatory requirement plus a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation demands that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) Should the organization is transprovincial.
Extra username and password are needed for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it requires legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected on the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a possible fine.
Doing a case legislation search could be as easy as coming into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case law searches, which include:
this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion on the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
14. While in the light with the position explained over, it really is concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be deemed for no fault more info of his very own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the length of service or during the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more